Friday, March 19, 2010

impossible.



I guess I would choose "Good Looking" and "Intelligent", I can use my intelligence to research self-induced "Emotional Stability", no?

6 comments:

  1. define good looking? :) i mean...i think i would have to go with ES as a given and intelligent if I HAD to pick two?? I THINK.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I dunno, I mean ES is relative, just like good looks can be. But I would much rather be good looking and figure all the rest of that shit out later. With a good psych consult and some religious training all ES will be granted. no?

    ReplyDelete
  3. whaaaat??? i am SOOO surprised to hear you say that. mainly, because of your recent male conquests. extremely attractive, but not so emotionally stable. i think being good looking is the most relative of the three. no amount of money/religious training, to me, can buy emotional stability. physical attraction is obviously a necessity in the beginning, but to sustain a relationship i think the other two outweigh the latter. and with that in mind good looking is gonna have to be at the bottom of my totem pole.

    ooo we should play a game! find 3 completely different facets of men, label them with all the different qualitys and then choose from there!

    ReplyDelete
  4. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  5. OOOH never mind about my previous post. i just realized that this is in reference to oneself. not in a potential mate. DUH! lol! well snap, in that case, DEF. good looking and ES. I think it's easier for guys to put up with a dumb girl then a crazy bish. With that clarified. What would you choose for a potential mate?

    ReplyDelete
  6. I would choose intelligence and emotional stability for sure. As we both know, I tend to choose men with two or less of these traits. IE. Oliver, smart as a whip, hot as a tea kettle, cold as ice. Sam, cute as a button, errr- kinda smart? (musical inclinations count right?) and cold as ice. Christopher, hotter than Hades, (-) on smarts, and emotionally as dry as Ghandi's sandal. I never get all three, but as I progressed in all of these relationships, the looks became less and less important. All I craved was emotional stability. annnd in Sam's case, some wet wipes for his bung hole. :) For myself, I guess I feel most comfortable going with intelligence and good looks because I am NOT emotionally stable. So, I'm sort of already living that life. And its frustrating, but in the immortal words of Drake, "I'm getting it in".

    You on the other hand, have all three. You aren't allowed to comment on this post. I just decided that.

    ReplyDelete